Mike Atnip Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 This was on my watch list on the competition. But I would much prefer Accordance because it is my go to Bible software. The Patrilogia sets are supposed to be on the radar there as well; But the Greek set would not be an easy one to digitize and do markup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nathan Parker Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Planche Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Very interested in this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. Smith Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 yup. Just as interested now as I was a few years ago when it first came up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Gladd Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Cobb Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I could be interested in this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misulejoha Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Padfield Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I already own a lot of the books in this series, but I would dearly love to have them in Accordance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlm Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 On 1/17/2024 at 8:53 PM, Mike Atnip said: This was on my watch list on the competition. But I would much prefer Accordance because it is my go to Bible software. The Patrilogia sets are supposed to be on the radar there as well; But the Greek set would not be an easy one to digitize and do markup. The Loeb Classical Library has a website which I believe has all the texts digitized. So the issue would be tagging. Manually tagging any large proportion of the LCL would be a massive undertaking, but untagged texts might be acceptable if Accordance improved its ability to work with them. It's not too complicated to find possible lexemes for an inflected form, and that's enough to look up a word in a lexicon. I wrote about this a few years ago: In another Loeb thread, I pointed out that the whole LCL is probably too large for Accordance to do at once. It would be more likely for them to pick a set of initial volumes to produce. So then the question is which volumes. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Gilbert Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 And it would be nice if Accordance could/would offer individual volumes, not just sets. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacMan Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Highly interested! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clint Cozier Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anders Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 I would love a tagged version of Plato, his entire oeuvre. That would be a dream come true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unix Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 +1 : On 3/29/2024 at 3:49 PM, anders said: I would love a tagged version of Plato, his entire oeuvre. That would be a dream come true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Pauley Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 Loeb does not seem to have Aquinas' Summa Th. There is a Kindle edition by the Aquinas Institute (ASIN: B07D3FQQ17). It would be great if these were available for Accordance...especially if they could be sold individually. The whole summa constat multa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlm Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 1 hour ago, Gary Pauley said: Loeb does not seem to have Aquinas' Summa Th. There is a Kindle edition by the Aquinas Institute (ASIN: B07D3FQQ17). It would be great if these were available for Accordance...especially if they could be sold individually. The whole summa constat multa. That probably needs its own module request thread. Loeb wouldn't have the Summa because it's not from antiquity but the Middle Ages. In the meantime, there's https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Pauley Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 5 hours ago, jlm said: That probably needs its own module request thread. Loeb wouldn't have the Summa because it's not from antiquity but the Middle Ages. In the meantime, there's https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.I Ah! Thanks for the link! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now