Sbjernegard Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Are there any plans for tagging the NETS? Would love to see that in a future update! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meehleis Posted March 8, 2021 Share Posted March 8, 2021 I would love to see the NETS tagged as well! :) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 I wished for years a LXX with numbers. Best would be the G/K Enhanced. And then translations with numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Weaks Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 Still no word about a tagged NETS? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel L Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 I'd be fine with a tagged SAAS or Brenton's -- any one of the three. I won't be picky. We have the tagged JPS for the MT, but there's nothing tagged for the LXX. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 What should I say after Accordance is strickt not willing. Again: Take the principle of the Goodrick/Kohlenbeger Enhanced system and tag the LXX. After that tag LXX Translations. A good start would be to take the Apostolic Bible Polyglotte. To tag a text with numbers isn't copyrighted. If you don't believe me, I have the answer from Robert Downs Director of Licensing & Subsidiary Rights from thomasnelson.com as e-mail from the publisher of the Same for Deuterocanonical books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Allison Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 Does anyone know of a numbering system currently available for the LXX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 (edited) I mentioned in the post above. I have for sure over 5 times mentioned https://apostolicbible.com. It is based on Strong's, but expanded. This would be a good start. Later a G/KE, maybe in companion of Thomas Nelson. May they are interested to help. As I mentioned before, they would be able to release a Strongest Strong https://www.amazon.com/Strongest-NIV-Exhaustive-Concordance-Strongs/dp/0310262852 with the LXX as "Now the Strongest Strong with LXX" or so. But Someone has to make the start. Rick Bennet wouldn't do, but maybe someone other from the Accordance folks. This would reduce the cost of making such huge undertaking. Maybe the time was not there in the past, but maybe today. Edited March 20, 2022 by Fabian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Weaks Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 2 hours ago, Mark Allison said: Does anyone know of a numbering system currently available for the LXX? Mark, When I made the benign request that revived this old request, I completely spaced out on the implications that the Strong or G/KE numbering system does not cover the LXX. This is indeed a large project, and enters into scholarly cataloging realm. I have my own thoughts on how best to accomplish this, with the biggest bang for buck. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 On 3/20/2022 at 1:07 PM, Mark Allison said: Does anyone know of a numbering system currently available for the LXX? Do we even need a numbering system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 10 minutes ago, R. Mansfield said: Do we even need a numbering system? Yes, for the Vulgate-T too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, Fabian said: Yes, for the Vulgate-T too. Yes, that's a very good example, @Fabian. The Vulgate is a translation of the Bible with extended canon not in the Hebrew Bible where we have tagging on words with Roman characters just like an English translation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Weaks Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Somewhere along the way, I came to think that key numbers were a dependency of the cross-highlighting feature, for instance. Perhaps I am wrong. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Joe Weaks said: Somewhere along the way, I came to think that key numbers were a dependency of the cross-highlighting feature, for instance. Perhaps I am wrong. I'm not a programmer. How it all actually works is a mystery of the ages for me. It seems like we might have two tasks to consider: (1) tagging a title like NETS with an extended OT canon, and (2) finding an additional method for cross highlighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlm Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 On 3/21/2022 at 7:56 PM, Joe Weaks said: Somewhere along the way, I came to think that key numbers were a dependency of the cross-highlighting feature, for instance. Perhaps I am wrong. I think that was originally the case, but now the MT-LXX parallel/interlinear and the Targums WordMap are also used for cross-highlighting. Presumably, if one made an LXX translations WordMap, it would enable cross highlighting and the TEXT command. However, LXX translations may have new editions, unlike the Targums, so perhaps a Strong’s-like numbering system would be better, in that each translation would be independently tagged. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Weaks Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 58 minutes ago, jlm said: a Strong’s-like numbering system would be better, in that each translation would be independently tagged. I think this is the case. Implementation of an LXX-expanded numbering system would provide several benefits then that can use the number tagging as a dependency. That includes more than one LXX edition and translations as well. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now