Difference in text formatting, Acc 13 to Acc 14

[Julia Falling]

I just reinstalled Accordance 14, having reverted to 13 until the bugs were worked out.  It seems to be working well.

 

I noticed that formatting for poetry seems to have changed.  Is this correct, or do I have a glitch?  The Accordance 14 formatting looks a bit sloppy.  Or is the issue my version?  Or is this not considered an issue?  Thanks. I did check other versions and they also seem to have the same issue:  If a single line of the text is wider than the pane width will accommodate, the text that moves to the next line is not indented. It is pleasing to the eye in 13; looks messy and distracting in 14.  Do I need to change something in my Prefs?

 

Thanks 

 

 

[Erhard]

It seems to be worse in the Windows version

 

[Julia Falling]

Yours looks a bit less messy, probably because the pane is wider.  Does it get worse if you narrow the pane?

[Erhard]

40 minutes ago, Julia Falling said:

Yours looks a bit less messy, probably because the pane is wider.  Does it get worse if you narrow the pane?

 

 

[Julia Falling]

Well, a narrower pane does worsen the formatting.

[Erhard]

How does it look compared to the physical Bible. I had a look at the NASB 95 in the print version and there is some inconsistency there as well for the second line.

The LSB (which is based on the NASB 95) is more consistent in the print version but not the Acc version.

 

[Erhard]

I just tried it for fun in Logos with similar results.

BW seems to just handle it without poetry formatting.

E sword is the same as BW