Michael Hunt Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 Is there a particular reason that the ESV notes defaults to the cross-references category when other translations notes all seem to default to the translation notes category? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Meiklejohn Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 Michael, I'm sure somebody will keep me right or put me right. But I seem to recollect a few years back crossway combined the notes with cross-ref's and then Accordance followed that in their next update to keep in line with the printed version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hunt Posted September 13, 2020 Author Share Posted September 13, 2020 Ah yes I seem to recall something like that happening. Shows you how heavily I have customised my library and then came to a different category decision than the default.I do think that consistency across all module types is still good thing to aim for. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 Or rename as crossrefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now