miketisdell Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 I am trying to search for names that contain a ג but do not contain a γ in the LXX transliteration. The problem I am having is in trying to exclude options that contain a γ. Accordance doesn't allow "<NOT> *γ*" and "* <NOT> *γ*" doesn't exclude words with a γ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Hi Mike, I think you want @- in the Greek field rather than the <NOT> but I am not able to test this right now. thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 Hi Mike, I think you want @- in the Greek field rather than the <NOT> but I am not able to test this right now. thx D I have tried the following options:*γ* *γ*@- @-*γ* *-γ* But so far I haven't found anything that works (I have found some that take a very long time to search). However, I did discover a very serious bug in 12.3.5 when I tried to view help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 NOTE: I have been able to get results close to what I want by moving the *γ* into the tagged Greek text. Negation appears to be broken in the MT-LXX searches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Are these results not what you are looking for? I find it cleaner (and faster!) to specify all the hebrew restrictions in my source hebrew tab, rather than making even more fields in the MT-LXX tab. And, you'll note that I have the 'NOT' logic specified rather than a - in my Greek field on the MTLXX. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) Are these results not what you are looking for? Screen Shot 2019-07-31 at 4.05.08 PM.png I find it cleaner (and faster!) to specify all the hebrew restrictions in my source hebrew tab, rather than making even more fields in the MT-LXX tab. And, you'll note that I have the 'NOT' logic specified rather than a - in my Greek field on the MTLXX. This is very close to what I did. I ended up specifying all restrictions in both the Hebrew and Greek source tabs. However, the results you provided are opposite of what I wanted i.e. I actually wanted proper names that were where ג was not transliterated as γ For example: Gen. 10:25 פלג φαλεκ Gen. 11:16 פלג φαλεκ Gen. 11:17 פלג φαλεκ Gen. 11:22 שׂרוג σερουχ Gen. 11:23 שׂרוג σερουχ That being said, negation in the MT-LXX module seems to be badly broken. Edited July 31, 2019 by miketisdell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Sorry, the search didn't update in the screenshot. If you create what I posted, you should get good results, and nothing is "badly broken". See this screenshot: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted August 1, 2019 Author Share Posted August 1, 2019 Sorry, the search didn't update in the screenshot. If you create what I posted, you should get good results, and nothing is "badly broken". See this screenshot: Screen Shot 2019-07-31 at 9.33.16 PM.png Yes, that is the results I am looking for, but I would ask you to test entering the negative criteria in the MT-LXX module before stating that it is not broken. When I put the negative criteria in that window it simply does not work no matter how I have it formatted. but if I take the same search criteria and put in in the source window it works. Positive search criteria also works in the MT-LXX correctly but negative criteria does not. Try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 In general, search criteria are much more developed and specific in texts that in tools. MT-LXX Parallel is a tool so searching will not be the same as in a text, but you do have the option of searching multiple fields with different criteria and an AND or OR relationship. I haven't followed all this discussion, am just stating general principles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted August 1, 2019 Author Share Posted August 1, 2019 In general, search criteria are much more developed and specific in texts that in tools. MT-LXX Parallel is a tool so searching will not be the same as in a text, but you do have the option of searching multiple fields with different criteria and an AND or OR relationship. I haven't followed all this discussion, am just stating general principles. I typically use search criteria in both the source tabs (which is typically set to "words" and allows me to use tagging, and in the MT-LXX which functions much more like a "letters" search. Normally this works well, but when I needed to do a negative search i.e. exclude items that matched a pattern rather than include them, I found that this was broken in the MT-LXX module. While I was able to provide search criteria with negation that was excepted as valid syntax, I was unable to get any search to correctly do negation in the MT-LXX module. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted August 1, 2019 Author Share Posted August 1, 2019 I typically use search criteria in both the source tabs (which is typically set to "words" and allows me to use tagging, and in the MT-LXX which functions much more like a "letters" search. Normally this works well, but when I needed to do a negative search i.e. exclude items that matched a pattern rather than include them, I found that this was broken in the MT-LXX module. While I was able to provide search criteria with negation that was excepted as valid syntax, I was unable to get any search to correctly do negation in the MT-LXX module. Here is an example: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Your use of is incorrect. It means that the second item should not be found anywhere in the scope (paragraph or article in a tool, verse, sentence chapel etc. in a text). You have to use @ to specify that the conditions attach to the same word. The search *@-*γ* works perfectly in a text, but it is not working in a tool. The @ symbol is not dimmed so in theory it should work, but as its use is to join a tag to a word, perhaps it should not work in a tool at all. I believe this is the search you want, but it does give extra positives in the case of Ramot Gilead. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted August 2, 2019 Author Share Posted August 2, 2019 Your use of <NOT> is incorrect. It means that the second item should not be found anywhere in the scope (paragraph or article in a tool, verse, sentence chapel etc. in a text). You have to use @ to specify that the conditions attach to the same word. The search *@-*γ* works perfectly in a text, but it is not working in a tool. The @ symbol is not dimmed so in theory it should work, but as its use is to join a tag to a word, perhaps it should not work in a tool at all. I believe this is the search you want, but it does give extra positives in the case of Ramot Gilead. MERGE.png Yes, I actually got a search that is working a little better when I specify the search criteria in the source tab (as you have done). It would be nice to see negation working in the MT-LXX tab. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now