blgriffin83 Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 How can I do a search for any reshes in the Hebrew text that have a dagesh in them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbcvida Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 (edited) try this -*רּ*= in a letters search Edited June 6 by mbcvida search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blgriffin83 Posted June 6 Author Share Posted June 6 3 hours ago, mbcvida said: try this -*רּ*= in a letters search Thanks! According to this search there are only 19 instances in the entire Hebrew bible where a dagesh occurs in a resh. As far as you know are these searches pretty accurate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian K. Mitchell Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 @blgriffin83 Check the following out...... Quote_Wikipedia in the most widely accepted version of the Hebrew Bible, there are 17 instances of Resh being marked with a dagesh.[4] The list is: 1 Samuel 1:6, 1 Samuel 10:24, 1 Samuel 17:25, 2 Kings 6:32, Jeremiah 39:12, Ezekiel 16:4 [×2], Habakkuk 3:13, Psalms 52:5, Proverbs 3:8, Proverbs 11:21, Proverbs 14:10, Proverbs 15:1, Job 39:9 (?[5]'), Song of Songs 5:2, Ezra 9:6, 2 Chronicles 26:10 (?[6]) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resh And see this post on Reddit: Quote Verse(s) Word 1 Sam. 1:6 הַרְּעִמָהּ 1 Sam 10:24, 17:25, 2 Kgs 6:32 הַרְּאִיתֶם Jer 39:12, Prov 11:21, 20:22 רָּע Ezek 16:4 כָרַּת Ibid שָׁרֵּךְ Hab 3:13 רֹּאשׁ Prov 3:8 לְשָׁרֶּךָ Prov 14:10 מָרַּת Prov 15:1 רַּךְ Song of Sg 5:2 שֶׁרֹּאשִׁי -- From Aryeh Kaplan's Sefer Yetzirah Pg 160, Table 28 https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/1hm410/resh_with_dagesh_in_tanakh_or_siddur/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blgriffin83 Posted June 6 Author Share Posted June 6 3 minutes ago, Brian K. Mitchell said: @blgriffin83 Check the following out...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resh And see this post on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/1hm410/resh_with_dagesh_in_tanakh_or_siddur/ Wow nice find thank you. What version is this most widely accepted version and is it available for Accordance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian K. Mitchell Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 1 minute ago, blgriffin83 said: What version is this most widely accepted version and is it available for Accordance? Not sure what the author of that Wikipedia article thinks is the most widely accepted Tanakh, but I would say Accordance does have the most accepted electronic versions of the Tanakh originating from the 1987 'Michigan-Claremont-Westminster' digital Hebrew Bible that has been updated many times since then. If we are talking about printed Hebrew Bibles then it is a different story. You have the BHS which is used by most translators of English versions and then you have a handful of other Tanakh also based on the Leningrad codex that differ from the BHS, then some Tanakh that are based on the Aleppo Codex, and a few that are based on the 2nd great Rabbinic Bible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nathan Parker Posted June 6 Share Posted June 6 The BHS (and our Hebrew Masoretic Text) and BHQ are the two most-used scholarly editions of the Hebrew text. Although if you get into people talking about the KJV or into Jewish customers, you're going to get additional answers. :-) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbcvida Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 (edited) Gen 2.10 and Lam 1.1 are not included although Accordance includes them in the BHS-Westminster text but not the ETCBC or Andersen-Forbes versions Edited June 7 by mbcvida spelling 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian K. Mitchell Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 3 hours ago, mbcvida said: Gen 2.10 and Lam 1.1 are not included although Accordance includes them in the BHS-Westminster text but not the ETCBC or Andersen-Forbes versions @mbcvida thanks for mentioning this! Yeah, the BHS and the ETCBC sometimes differ.... https://forums.accordancebible.com/topic/25031-an-accentual-difference-between-the-etcbc-and-the-bhs-w4-genesis-529/#comment-123195 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now