Extra Alef in Num 22:39 (BHS-T)?

[Martin Z]

Hi,

I'm not sure whether it is a typo or not. There is a lonely Alef in Num 22:39, BHS-T.

My hard copy BHS does not have it.

 

[ScottDF]

In the Help menu of Accordance is an entry to report text corrections. It's more efficient than the forums. 

[Martin Z]

Hi Scott,

 

Thanks.

I'm not sure whether it is a typo or not. If not, I might be able to learn something from the forum users here. That's why I posted it on the forum.

 

Just spotted another stand alone Sin letter in Jer 10:9.

 

[Fabian]

39 minutes ago, Martin Z said:

Hi,

I'm not sure whether it is a typo or not. There is a lonely Alef in Num 22:39, BHS-T.

My hard copy BHS does not have it.

 

Interesting: I don't have it.

 

 

Interesting 2: But I have footnotes indicator you don't have.

 

It seems the Footnote "a" comes out as an aleph by you. As I see "b" and "c" but not "a".

 

A rendering issue, seems to be the guilty one. 

 

 

 

 

 

[Fabian]

26 minutes ago, Martin Z said:

Hi Scott,

 

Thanks.

I'm not sure whether it is a typo or not. If not, I might be able to learn something from the forum users here. That's why I posted it on the forum.

 

Just spotted another stand alone Sin letter in Jer 10:9.

 

Also here:

 

I have a footnote. "c"

 

 

 

 

Are you up to date with the modules?

[Fabian]

BTW: I'm on Mac. I see you have Win and Mac. Does this happen on both?

[Martin Z]

Hi @Fabian,

 

12 hours ago, Fabian said:

Are you up to date with the modules?

 

I just checked and saw an update for BHS-T. After the update, they show correctly now.

Thank you very much!

[Fabian]

Sorry, nothing to learn about the Hebrew.