marcato15 Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 I'm trying to recreate Kubo's Special Vocabulary list, which lists all the words used less 50 times in the whole Bible but more than 5 times in the book. I tried 2 word searches in every verse, the first was [COUNT 5-50] <AND> [RANGE matt] with the range set to New Testament in one window (5347 words), and the second was [count 5-50] with range set to Matthew in the second window (2948 words). Then in the the third window I did *@[HITS GNT-T] <AND> *@[HITS GNT-T 2] , but this resulted in 11181 words. I thought AND would mean only words that occur in both lists, but it seems to be doing something else. What am I missing and is there any easier way to accomplish this task? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Lang Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Try [HITS GNT-T]@[HITS GNT-T 2]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcato15 Posted August 5, 2012 Author Share Posted August 5, 2012 Yes! That worked perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Hi David, thanks for the suggestion. Could you explain the logic of why the <AND> command didn't work, and why the @ tag did? Ta! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Its the fundamental difference between and @. requires that the two elements are both present within the current search context, that often defaults to 'Verse'. @ requires that the two elements are both present within the hit word. So, marcato's first search was finding verses that had both words from tab 1 and words from tab 2 in them, rather than finding all words that matched both tabs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 I knew a trombonist would have the answer! Good times in SF Joel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean R. Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Is there a reason search details aren't available for a search that utilizes the Hits command? For the search being discussed here, search analysis is necessary for the search to be easily usable (i.e., seeing a list of the words that match the search criteria). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 I did the search more simply, with this in the second tab: [COUNT 5-50] @ [HITS GNT-T] I found 21533 hits. You must set the Range in the pop-up menu to get an accurate count. The details work just fine, as they do in most searches except those comparing CONTENTS of two tabs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcato15 Posted August 5, 2012 Author Share Posted August 5, 2012 Thanks Helen. That is more simple. Joel did a good job in help explaining the difference between @ and <AND>. Is there any resource explaining this stuff? I tried looking, but couldn't find anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted August 6, 2012 Share Posted August 6, 2012 Our award winning Help files! You can search them or go to the sections Biblical Research and Analyses > Search Criteria, and Biblical Research and Analyses > Work with Grammatically Tagged Text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.