Fabian Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 One of many examples. I think they should be fully G/K tagged. Best all of your text. Especially the OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 22, 2022 Author Share Posted April 22, 2022 As Strong's is outdated it would be good to change all to G/K. And add numbers to the Apocrypha, the LXX, the Latin. Thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Allison Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 I think this is an issue with the markup of the NIV11-GKE. The word "the" should be tagged as "NDT" (Not directly translated). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 22, 2022 Author Share Posted April 22, 2022 58 minutes ago, Mark Allison said: I think this is an issue with the markup of the NIV11-GKE. The word "the" should be tagged as "NDT" (Not directly translated). O.K. I found a few like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 22, 2022 Author Share Posted April 22, 2022 Are you sure? The NIV 84 has them too and this has not NDT (AFAIK). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 23, 2022 Author Share Posted April 23, 2022 I have two guesses. 1. a bug in the App. As it happens with the HMT-W4 on several places too. This was not before. Or bugs in the text. 2. The ETCBC is not fully tagged with G/K numbers. Conclusion: Serious tagging issues and not all texts are fully tagged. Both has to be addressed soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted May 22, 2022 Author Share Posted May 22, 2022 BTW the GNT-TRS lacks the tagging in some words too. Thanks for the fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now