Jump to content

Are the BHS ETCBC Texts not fully G/K tagged?


Fabian
 Share

Recommended Posts

185318915_Bildschirmfoto2022-04-22um19_31_35.thumb.png.188d49022e9260763391ab009d803e99.png

 

One of many examples. 

 

I think they should be fully G/K tagged. Best all of your text. Especially the OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Strong's is outdated it would be good to change all to G/K. And add numbers to the Apocrypha, the LXX, the Latin. 

 

Thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is an issue with the markup of the NIV11-GKE. The word "the" should be tagged as "NDT" (Not directly translated). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Mark Allison said:

I think this is an issue with the markup of the NIV11-GKE. The word "the" should be tagged as "NDT" (Not directly translated). 

O.K. I found a few like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure? The NIV 84 has them too and this has not NDT (AFAIK). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two guesses.

1. a bug in the App. As it happens with the HMT-W4 on several places too. This was not before. Or bugs in the text.

1074139237_Bildschirmfoto2022-04-23um09_30_26.thumb.png.264adc5eb3b1f490377083b400e24712.png

 

image.thumb.png.fedb27c947e998d90db1c0b0a46f56e8.png

 

 

 

2. The ETCBC is not fully tagged with G/K numbers. 

 

1287828380_Bildschirmfoto2022-04-23um09_21_10.thumb.png.b76218825c4c2cbabc1c194919b40cea.png

 

 

 

 

1752005359_Bildschirmfoto2022-04-23um09_24_17.thumb.png.d55665bbc98f9992ec818fe4ca958183.png

 

 

Conclusion: Serious tagging issues and not all texts are fully tagged. Both has to be addressed soon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

BTW the GNT-TRS lacks the tagging in some words too. 

 

Thanks for the fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...