Jump to content

Concordance


Dtracy21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if Accordance 13 has a Concordance.  I tried looking for it and couldn't find one.  I have an iMac desktop.  Let me know where to navigate if it has one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

* [RANGE Gen -rev] as Search or a particular section  * [RANGE Gen  4,6-Judge 5,5]

 

The asterisk is for "all" words in the [RANGE ...]

 

373053729_Bildschirmfoto2021-09-11um23_27_50.thumb.png.0d7c2a3a68a34b338c831aa9ddaa3deb.png

 

 

Then go to 

1628424465_Bildschirmfoto2021-09-11um23_28_18.thumb.png.a6c25763119a70639e90e4f26f0f2d18.png

 

You wil get:

 

217791868_Bildschirmfoto2021-09-11um23_29_19.thumb.png.63ff7e3c728f07695430ebd127c6ffcf.png

 

 

Edited by Fabian
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @Fabianhas pointed out using Accordance's search and analytical tools can provide you with a miriad of information far superior to a simple concordance alone. Checkout the search and analytical tutorials as well as the Accordance help files on more ways to use these features

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And keep in mind the book order. The  * [RANGE Gen-Mal] has in the Hebrew Bible another corpus than in the KJV. For the full OT in the Hebrew Bible you have to go from Gen to 2Chr. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Michael Hunt said:

As @Fabianhas pointed out using Accordance's search and analytical tools can provide you with a miriad of information far superior to a simple concordance alone. Checkout the search and analytical tutorials as well as the Accordance help files on more ways to use these features

Also the [COUNT ...] Command. There you can say: I search for word that are 1-50 times in the Bible or form 2-4 and 6-100.

Bildschirmfoto 2021-09-12 um 00.17.22.png

 

 

And you can combine the two

192480286_Bildschirmfoto2021-09-12um00_21_43.png.3288c795b8ebbfd0573d03c2f5a9210e.png

 

Edited by Fabian
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When i used to use a Dead tree concordance i was thinking about words from the really sound version and often felt frustrated because the concordance was based on the kjv but the jerusalem or niv translators had used different words and phrases so i was mentally juggling with different translations. With accordance search, especially going back to the original language and limiting the range, i can find what im looking for in any of the tagged translations much more quickly and reliably and my concordance is sitting on a shelf, unused and unloved gathering dust.

Edited by ukfraser
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ukfraser said:

really sound version

 

😂

 

Back to original poster: it's fair to think of Accordance as BEING a concordance, not just HAVING a concordance. Everything a concordance can do, Accordance does. It might be helpful to explain what information you're trying to get, and then people could give better suggestions on how that would work in Accordance.  

Edited by JonathanHuber
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...