Jump to content

1 John 4:3 in GNT-Sinaiticus and GNT-Alexandrinus


Rex Howe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is the Accordance text incorrect in GNT-Sinaiticus and GNT -Alexandrinus at 1 John 4:3? Codex 01 here:

5624F875-819A-4BCD-A472-9181EE268623.thumb.jpeg.9356fa6c8cd908cd112ed4873c16983b.jpeg

 

 

Codex 02 here:

 

F17184C6-E69C-45D5-8BF8-E9076D6B7BAD.thumb.jpeg.794b24ae2e50421fce4a4f57772b6ef2.jpeg

 

 

Here is the text from the Accordance modules:

 

E7D6C56A-5A3E-4CA1-BFCA-3C65A092B212.thumb.jpeg.ffa31894e8dbcc455291a15a866e5d2c.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rex,

 

Could you point to the discrepancy precisely ? GNT-SI seems to match codex 1 and GNT-VAT code 2 for John 4:3. I'm not seeing a difference. Which word or words are out of whack ?

 

thx

D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure D. 

  • Accordance NA28 - καὶ πᾶν πνεῦμα ὃ μὴ ὁμολογεῖ τὸν Ἰησοῦν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ οὐκ ἔστιν· καὶ τοῦτό ἐστιν τὸ τοῦ ἀντιχρίστου ὃ ἀκηκόατε ὅτι ἔρχεται, καὶ νῦν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἐστὶν ἤδη.
  • Accordance Codex 01 - ⲕⲁⲓ ⲧⲟⲩⲧⲟ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ     ⲧⲟ ⲧⲟⲩ ⲁⲛⲧⲓⲭⲣⲓⲥⲧⲟⲩ     ⲟ ⲁⲕⲏⲕⲟⲁⲙⲉⲛ     ⲟⲧⲓ ⲉⲣⲭⲉⲧⲁⲓ ⲕⲁⲓ     ⲛⲩⲛ ⲉⲛ ⲧⲱ ⲕⲟⲥ     ⲙⲱ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ ⲏⲇⲏ
  • Accordance Codex 02 - ⲕⲁⲓ ⲧⲟⲩⲧⲟ ⲉⲥⲧⲓ̅     ⲧⲟ ⲧⲟⲩ ⲁⲛⲧⲓⲭⲣⲓⲥⲧⲟⲩ ⲟ ⲁⲕⲏⲕⲟ     ⲁⲧⲁⲓ ⲟⲧⲓ ⲉⲣⲭⲉⲧⲁⲓ ⲕⲁⲓ ⲛⲩⲛ ⲉ̅     ⲧⲱ ⲕⲟⲥⲙⲱ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ ⲏⲇⲏ
  • Accordance Codex 03 - ⲕⲁⲓ ⲡⲁⲛ ⲡⲛⲉⲩⲙⲁ ⲟ ⲙⲏ     ⲟⲙⲟⲗⲟⲅⲉⲓ ⲧⲟⲛ ⲓ̅ⲛ̅ ⲉⲕ ⲧⲟⲩ     ⲑ̅ⲩ̅ ⲟⲩⲕ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ ⲕⲁⲓ ⲧⲟⲩ     ⲧⲟ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ ⲧⲟ ⲧⲟⲩ ⲁⲛⲧⲓ     ⲭⲣⲉⲓⲥⲧⲟⲩ ⲟ ⲁⲕⲏⲕⲟⲁⲧⲉ     ⲟⲧⲓ ⲉⲣⲭⲉⲧⲁⲓ ⲕⲁⲓ ⲛⲩⲛ     ⲉⲛ ⲧⲱ ⲕⲟⲥⲙⲱ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ     ⲏⲇⲏ

I have struck-out the text that is similar in the NA28 and each Codex for 1 John 4:3. However, as the manuscript images and transcriptions from INTF indicate, both 01 and 02 DO include the και παν πνα/πνευμα ο μη ομολογει . . . clause. Maybe the similarity at the end of verse 2 has caused the omission?

 

—RJH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I see. I have a user bible I did of the Sinaiticus and I checked that and I have :

 

1John 4:3  (Sin. 4:3) και παν
 πνα ο μη ομολογει ιν κν εν ϲαρκι εληλυθοτα εκ
 του θυ ουκ εϲτιν
 και τουτο εϲτιν
 το του αντιχριϲτου
 οτι ακηκοαμεν
 οτι ερχεται και
 νυν εν τω κοϲμω εϲτιν ηδη

 

So as you say, it would appear that text before και τουτο ... is missing in Acc.

 

Thx

D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope I am understanding things correctly, but isn't this just a versification variance?

I.e.,

ⲡⲁⲛ
    ⲡ̅ⲛ̅ⲁ̅ ⲟ ⲟⲙⲟⲗⲟ
    ⲅⲉⲓ ⲓ̅ⲛ̅ ⲭ̅ⲛ̅ ⲉⲛ ⲥⲁⲣ
    ⲕⲓ ⲉⲗⲏⲗⲩⲑⲟⲧⲁ ⲉⲕ
    ⲧⲟⲩ ⲑ̅ⲩ̅ ⲟⲩⲕ ⲉⲥⲧⲓⲛ

is in Sinaiticus in Accordance, but it's part of verse 2 instead of v3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mgvh, 

 

Hi there. No, in verse three there is a negation (μη) between the article ο and ομολογει, as well as, other distinguishing features. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Mark!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...