Spurious underlining in imported user notes

[jlm]

Today I deleted and reimported a set of User Notes (adding notes this way). Some of the imported notes have spurious underlining, even though the underlined spans are not marked up in any way. To offer a small example of this, I attach a ZIP of RTF notes on Matthew 1:1–3. The underlining appears in the note on Matthew 1:3 when all three notes are imported: "Observe that in the genealogy of Christ, with the exception of His Blessed Mother, only four females are made mention of". If the file for Matthew 1:3 is the only one imported, there is no underlining. There is no markup in the RTF that corresponds to the underlining: {\pard \ql \f0 \sa180 \li0 \fi0 Observe that in the genealogy of Christ, with the exception of His Blessed Mother, only four females are made mention of.

 

The fact that it doesn't happen when the note is imported alone makes me suspect that something is not being reset in the import process between one RTF file and another.

 

Archive.zip

Edited July 20, 2020 by jlm

[jlm]

Thank you for fixing this in 13.1.4.