Fabian Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Something like this: https://community.logos.com/forums/p/113893/755223.aspx Click on a word in a morphology tagged Bible, right click "Morphology Chart" and you get a full Chart of all variations which are tagged. I know the information is available in Accordance, but at the moment no filter to see them in a Chart. Greetings Fabian 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortenjensen Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 +10 The very best thing would be individual charts that could be called up through the contextual menu. The next best would be a tagged reference to principal charts. This is a feature in bibleworks which is a fine solution. Morten 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Gladd Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Gowing Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomTarzan Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Yes, we need this feature! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted September 8, 2019 Author Share Posted September 8, 2019 As a reminder: It is requested here also. In BW it is called "Forms" in the Analysis Window. Greetings Fabian 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miclew Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Please!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinjevans Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GYDOF1729 Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Gladd Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 +1000 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted April 21, 2020 Share Posted April 21, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Cobb Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 + 1. I used this feature a lot in BW. It's especially helpful if you're trying to go beyond just reading the texts (i.e., building a passive knowledge) and are trying to work towards an oral or written capability (active knowledge). 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 At present, I use the Research tab on Greek texts to find attested forms that I am trying to check spelling of when writing. With enough Greek texts behind it, it is often enough. But a morph chart would help too. Thx D 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Thomas Sandberg Posted April 24, 2020 Share Posted April 24, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlm Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 +1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TYA Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 (edited) +1 Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek Edited April 26, 2020 by TYA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattChristianOT Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 That is a tall order. Essentially re-tagging everything and then adding a further code loop on top of that with individual functionality per word. It would be awesome but what a task I would imagine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 26, 2020 Share Posted April 26, 2020 I don't see the need for a retag. The words are already tagged with lex forms. All this requires is to trigger the search from a context menu option and some display work. Acc can already answer the question from the existing tagging unless I'm missing something. Thx D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Cobb Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 That is a tall order. Essentially re-tagging everything and then adding a further code loop on top of that with individual functionality per word. It would be awesome but what a task I would imagine I'm not so sure. In BW, this was implemented as a new feature in their last iteration. There, I think it was more a question of doing an inflected search and putting it together with the tagging info. BW was a small company, and I couldn't imagine them going back and re-tagging their OT and NT texts. This is what it looked like in BW (right-most screen): Very nice as the results were collated immediately upon mousing over a word! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattChristianOT Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 I'm not so sure. In BW, this was implemented as a new feature in their last iteration. There, I think it was more a question of doing an inflected search and putting it together with the tagging info. BW was a small company, and I couldn't imagine them going back and re-tagging their OT and NT texts. This is what it looked like in BW (right-most screen): forms in BW.jpg Very nice as the results were collated immediately upon mousing over a word! I don't see the need for a retag. The words are already tagged with lex forms. All this requires is to trigger the search from a context menu option and some display work. Acc can already answer the question from the existing tagging unless I'm missing something. Thx D Sounds easier than I assumed then- *wipes brow and turns face towards the state of Florida* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 Out of curiosity, for all of those "+1"ing this, what is the advantage of these charts or 'Forms' table over our analysis? By simply searching for the lemma and pulling up Analysis, with some simple customization I can get what seems to be the exact same information. Is the advantage just the fewer steps and more 2D columned display? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 27, 2020 Author Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) Simplicity like the Live-Click. And much faster. In Accordance is all a Search, but this makes a lot slower than it can be. I was in a conversation with a friend about translating a word and how the related words are konjugiert. There was no time to do every time a search. So we opened BW for it. And the visual effects especial of Logos are übersichtlicher also the one from BW. Edited April 27, 2020 by Fabian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) I assumed it was just the fewer steps. But I also initially thought that all possible forms, rather than all attested in the current text, was what was wanted, which would be a bunch more work. But this just seems like a workflow optimization. Thx D Edited April 27, 2020 by דָנִיאֶל Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Cobb Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 Is the advantage just the fewer steps and more 2D columned display? Yes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now