Jump to content

Question to Bib. Scholars - Accordance with Mellel/BE/DT vs NotaBene


J A Miller
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am preparing to write a thesis in biblical studies and am switching to the Mac. I will be using BibleWorks 7 via emulation alongside Accordance in OS X. I also need to purchase a package that includes a word processor, bibliography program, and databse manager. After some research, I have narrowed my options down to two: use native Mac apps - Mellel/Bookends/DevonThink or emulate NotaBene. My questions are as follows:

 

(1) Mellel has been suggested as a WP alongside Accordance. How well does Mellel export to MS Word? This may be a requirement for me in order to work with my thesis advisor.

(2) I would like input from any others who use Mellel in my field. I will be using a variety of languages (Eng, Heb, Ara, Syr, Grk, Germ), and am thinking about Mellel because of its language support. However, I am also looking toward the future and will likely need to utilize Akkadian and Ugaritic in future studies. I am not sure how this would be supported on the Mac, but perhaps someone else knows.

(3) Any general information on the interaction of Bookends and DevonThink with Mellel would be appreciated.

(4) Is it possible to export data results from Accordance to Nota Bene. How so?

(5) I would also be interested in feedback from anyone who has published using the Mac platform. What do you use?

(6) The only other Mac native app (of which I am aware) besides MS Word that has cross-referencing is Nisus Writer Pro. How does this compare to Mellel? (My problem with Mellel is that I really need cross-referencing and I cannot afford to wait on them).

 

Thank you in advance for all of your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(6) The only other Mac native app (of which I am aware) besides MS Word that has cross-referencing is Nisus Writer Pro. How does this compare to Mellel? (My problem with Mellel is that I really need cross-referencing and I cannot afford to wait on them).

 

NeoOffice also includes a cross-reference feature, and it can work with multiple languages and right-to-left writing. It cannot, however, interface with End Note, and its own bibliography feature is (so I've heard) frustratingly limited. Probably not the solution for your situation.

 

Lorinda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(1) Mellel has been suggested as a WP alongside Accordance. How well does Mellel export to MS Word? This may be a requirement for me in order to work with my thesis advisor.

 

The best way to do this is to export the Mellel document as an RTF document which preserves more of the appearance than does exporting directly to Word. The results are generally acceptable, and even RTL language information seems to be correctly preserved (Word on the Mac does not support RTL languages, even in its latest manifestation due to be released in the coming weeks).

 

The other option is to save the document as a PDF. IIRC Adobe Reader now allows some comments to be added to PDFs, so this may allow for notes to be edited by your thesis advisor and then returned to you.

 

(2) I would like input from any others who use Mellel in my field. I will be using a variety of languages (Eng, Heb, Ara, Syr, Grk, Germ), and am thinking about Mellel because of its language support. However, I am also looking toward the future and will likely need to utilize Akkadian and Ugaritic in future studies. I am not sure how this would be supported on the Mac, but perhaps someone else knows.

 

Obviously English and German are no problem. Mellel has in-built support for using two different fonts automatically based on the input language (determined usually by the keyboard selected), so things become a little trickier if you need separate fonts for each of the languages you wish to use. Having said that, I regularly mix Greek, Hebrew, and various European languages without much trouble.

 

Mellel is unique among Mac word processors in that it supports OpenType, so this enhances the range of fonts and features you can access. The main issue for Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Akkadian, and Ugaritic is the choice of fonts. Mellel has a fonts page which links to a large range of fonts for all these languages (and more). I've not had problems with any of the fonts I've tried, and Mellel allows me to use fonts I otherwise couldn't use on the Mac.

 

As for your other questions, I can't tell you much except that Mellel has good built-in support for Bookends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information. Especially helpful is knowing that Word does not support RTL. That is a bit of a shock.

 

[Edit: Do you have the link for the fonts page? I am having trouble finding it. Thanks.]

Edited by Helen Brown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information. Especially helpful is knowing that Word does not support RTL. That is a bit of a shock.

 

Yes, quite disappointing. However, I've found that exporting RTF and opening that in Word on a Windows system does correctly preserve the unicode text.

 

[Edit: Do you have the link for the fonts page? I am having trouble finding it. Thanks.]

 

Take a look here: http://www.mellel.com/downloadfont.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may also want to check out Nisus Writer Pro. I am just finishing my graduate work in theology, and have used Mellel and NWP. NWP does a better job interacting with Word. Bookends, by the way, is one great app. And its integration with Mellel is exceptional, though it works great with NWP as well.

Edited by dgarrett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

A late reply to this, but I'd like to suggest for Mellel users who need some sort of collaboration to look at a.nnotate.com

 

I am writing my dissertation in Mellel, and I use annotate for giving drafts to my advisors to read, and they mark it up online. Going PDF is so much better than going into Word from Mellel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a side note, Mellel NOW has cross-referencing. The cross-referencing is superb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Yes, quite disappointing. However, I've found that exporting RTF and opening that in Word on a Windows system does correctly preserve the unicode text.

 

Exportint to .doc or .rtf is the same in Mellel. They are both an RTF export, but just with different extensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Mellel/Bookends user.

(1) Mellel has been suggested as a WP alongside Accordance. How well does Mellel export to MS Word? This may be a requirement for me in order to work with my thesis advisor.

(2) I would like input from any others who use Mellel in my field. I will be using a variety of languages (Eng, Heb, Ara, Syr, Grk, Germ), and am thinking about Mellel because of its language support. However, I am also looking toward the future and will likely need to utilize Akkadian and Ugaritic in future studies. I am not sure how this would be supported on the Mac, but perhaps someone else knows.

 

I can confirm that Hebrew, Arabic, Syr, and Greek will work when exporting as a .doc filetype from Mellel, and opened directly in MS Word 2007. The other languages, Ugaritic and Akkadian export fine, but the specific font used in Mellel is not carried through into Word, and thus these would have to be assigned inside of Word, which might not be what you're after.

 

Entering Ugaritic and Akkadian can be done on the Mac side: Unicode for Ugaritic, and partially Unicode + massive Private Use area for Akkadian. The glyph index for "Cuneiform" submitted to Unicode was driven by Sumerian largely, and pays no regard to NA (Neo-Assyrian), or OB (Old Babylonian) cursive or lapidary. So, for example, to enter the sign AM would require knowing that it is a complex sign made of GUD x KUR. Many intermediate/advanced students of Akkadian might not ever make this connection and be lost as to why AM is missing. To address this obstacle, I wrote my own input method inside OS X Leopard that lets me assign the NA or OB sign names to these "complex" signs, so entering AM is as simple as entering AM. This also allowed me to enter homophones, e.g. tu, t

Edited by Thomas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...