Peter Bekins Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 I appreciate the ability to switch to the more neutral morphological labels when searching for Hebrew verbs (qatal instead of perfect, yiqtol instead of imperfect, etc.), but I just noticed that the term for wawConsecutive is currently spelled wayiqtol. It should be wayyiqtol with a doubled y. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Google gives some 500 results for the single y form and 11,000 for the double, so you are correct that it would be best to fix this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Bekins Posted February 26, 2016 Author Share Posted February 26, 2016 Google gives some 500 results for the single y form and 11,000 for the double, so you are correct that it would be best to fix this. And most of those 500 are typos, mis-hits in the search engine (wǝyiqtol hit as wayiqtol) or referring to a separate phenomenon (wa + yiqtol, not wayyiqtol). You trust Google over a PhD and loyal Accordance user? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Holmstedt Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Pete's correct. There should be two "y"s in the label. I noticed this a week or so ago but forgot to post it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Gilbert Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Hi, First, I'd like to thank Accordance again for this new label. For the sake of non-specialists on the Forum, the SBL Handbook of Style says to transliterate dagesh forte with a doubled consonant (the dagesh in the yod in וַיִּקְטֹל) (for both academic and general-purpose style) and not to transliterate silent shewa (academic style, and for general-purpose style assumed), so of course, Drs. Bekins and Holmstedt are correct. Regards, Michel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 I was trusting that Google's huge majority for wayyiqtol is correct, and suggesting that we fix this for the next release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Bekins Posted February 26, 2016 Author Share Posted February 26, 2016 I was trusting that Google's huge majority for wayyiqtol is correct, and suggesting that we fix this for the next release. Yes, just teasing. Thanks for fixing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Anderson Posted April 21, 2021 Share Posted April 21, 2021 Hi there, I was wondering if any could please help me change morphological labels from perfect etc. to weyyiqtol etc.? I've been trying to find a way but so far so no luck! Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now