William Varner Posted February 13, 2007 Posted February 13, 2007 I searched for all Future Participles in the NT and 13 were returned. One, however, is a present participle (katakrinwn in Romans 8:34). Any explanation? Will
jpkang Posted February 13, 2007 Posted February 13, 2007 If you use Amplify > Language > Parsing, you'll see that future is an alternative parsing for the form. I was going to check Perseus, but the site seems unresponsive at the moment.
DELETED Posted February 13, 2007 Posted February 13, 2007 If you look at the parsing window for Romans 8:34, you'll see that that participle has a secondary parsing in which it is a future participle. It is accounting for that secondary parsing, not just the parsing that shows up in the instant details box. HTH,
William Varner Posted February 13, 2007 Author Posted February 13, 2007 Yes, I now see that it has a double parsing, depending on where the accent was originally placed - ultima or penult. Only the present participle parsing, however, showed up in the instant details window. Thanks for the quick replies. Will
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.