Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'waw consecutive'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Official
    • Accordance Announcements
    • Tips for Users
  • Accordance Discussions
    • General Accordance Topics
    • Technical Support
    • Bug Swatters - Mac
    • Bug Swatters - Windows
    • Accordance for iOS
    • Accordance for Android
    • Original Languages
    • Syntax Modules
    • Feature Requests
    • Module Requests
    • Webinars & eAcademy
    • Preaching and Teaching with Accordance
    • Podcasts
    • Obsolete Discussions
  • Spanish Forums/Foros en español
    • Temas generales relacionados con Accordance
    • Ayuda y resolución de problemas
  • General
    • Mainly Macintosh
    • Windows Wisdom
    • Forum Comments, Suggestions & Help
    • Greek in a Year

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Found 3 results

  1. Hi, Aas the title describes, I am wanting to generate a list of Hebrew verbs which INCLUDE the pronominal suffixe and waw-consecutive. I want this list to be restricted only to the range of Jonah 1-4 and include full parsing (including suffix). How is this done? I have learned how to create a basic Hebrew verb list with parsing, etc. but noted that the suffix and waw-consec are all removed. suggestions (or better: command line examples)? Thanks, Jason
  2. I was wondering how Accordance parses imperfect waw-consecutive forms - as imperfects? as apocapated? as jussives? I've seen all three in instant details. For example: וַיַּרְא in Gen 1:31 parsed in Accordance as "Qal wawConsec 3 masc sing apoc” and in the same verse וַיְהִ is also parsed as "Qal wawConsec 3 masc sing apoc” By “apocapated” does Accordance mean jussive, or something else? (I know apocapated refers to a shortened form – my students and I were just debating whether or not Accordance is implying it’s a shortened form of the imperfect as distinct from the jussive because the instant details doesn’t say “jussive” although” Jussive” is used by Accordance elsewhere וַיַּעַשׂ in Gen 1:7 "Qal wawConsec 3 masc sing apoc" and in Gen 2:22 וַיִּבֶן Qal wawConsec 3 masc sing apoc. This led me to assume that Accordance doesn't use the term "jussive" for these forms. But then I found this in Ruth 1:8: [יַעֲשֶׂה [יַעַשׂ in which both are listed as "Qal Impf 3 masc sing jussiveB" (the one on the right with the final he is not a jussive). So my question is, in the Hebrew verb parsing (instant details), what does "apocapated" refer to - a shortened impf that is not a jussive, or does apocapated refer to the jussive (in Accordance-ease)? And if Accordance uses the term "jussive", why not for verbs that are actually jussives? and why use both "Impf" and "jussive" for a jussive in Ruth 1:8? Thanks for the clarification! Catherine McDowell Professor of OT and Hebrew @ Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in Charlotte, NC
  3. I tried to search "waw consecutive perfect" (whatever you may call it) but I found out that option is not available though I have "was consecutive" option that is only for waw consecutive prefix conjugation. I hope I am missing something. If I want to search waw consecutive perfect form of a certain verb or that grammatical entity in general, do I have to do the construct search or put a complicating set of commands?
×
×
  • Create New...